Source and state map
Document schedules, actual agent states, contact workload, intervals, time zones, and exclusions.
SAGEPOINT ANALYTICS · SERVICES
Staffing decisions need a shared view of scheduled time, actual states, and workload by interval. We connect your existing WFM and ACD outputs into reporting managers can verify.
The problem
Occupancy and adherence are easy to misread when systems use different intervals, state codes, or exclusions. Before charting a gap, we agree on the calculation and the source that supports it.
What you get
We build reporting from the WFM, ACD, and spreadsheet data you already have. The work covers metric definitions, reconciliation, and interval views. It does not create schedules or replace your WFM software.
Document schedules, actual agent states, contact workload, intervals, time zones, and exclusions.
Agree on occupancy, adherence, and staffing gap formulas for each program and reporting period.
Show scheduled versus actual staffing and workload by interval where source granularity allows.
Flag missing schedules, state gaps, and late ACD data before managers use the report.
Hand over calculation notes, refresh steps, and review guidance for supervisors.
How it works
A free 30–45 minute assessment reviews current staffing decisions and sample WFM and ACD exports.
We scope intervals, program mappings, measures, access, review rounds, and refresh needs.
We reconcile records and test formulas with supervisors before finalizing the reporting views.
We provide documentation and training. Ongoing Support starts at US$450/month if later changes are needed.
Validation
Before handoff we compare totals with your source exports and systems, and we document any difference and its cause. You review a working version with your own data before the project closes.
Package fit
The 14-Day Dashboard Pilot (US$750, paid on delivery) can clarify states and definitions. Executive Cockpit is a fixed US$3,900 for a scoped reporting view over 4–6 weeks. Control Room starts at US$15,000 over 10–14 weeks when broader data integration is required. Scope determines fit.
Compare packages →FAQ
We agree on which handling and available states count and inspect what your ACD exports provide. The report documents numerator, denominator, exclusions, and interval rules.
Yes, when schedule and actual-state data share reliable agent IDs, timestamps, and interval detail. We show gaps and flag missing records.
Yes, if schedules, states, and program assignments can be mapped consistently. We retain program-specific rules rather than combining incompatible definitions.
It depends on export or API access and source latency. We specify a feasible cadence and show when one feed is incomplete or late.
Usually, if the tool provides usable exports or API access and spreadsheets contain stable schedules or mappings. We assess those sources before committing to a build.
Related services
Your numbers live in spreadsheets, your CRM and your accounting system, and every report means copying between them. We build one dashboard that pulls from all of them and updates itself, so you see the same numbers your team sees.
Explore service →Every week someone downloads the same files, copies rows, fixes formulas and emails the report. We turn that routine into a repeatable process that consolidates the data, flags what looks wrong and sends the report on schedule.
Explore service →QuickBooks knows your invoices and expenses. Your spreadsheet or CRM knows your pipeline and targets. We connect them in one dashboard so you can see margin, cash and overdue accounts next to sales without rebuilding the same export every month.
Explore service →Queue metrics, CRM outcomes, and quality data sit in different exports. We build an operational view that helps supervisors explain changes and act on the same agreed definitions.
Explore service →Each client expects a different cut of the same operational data, while your analysts reconcile exports by hand. We turn those agreed reporting obligations into a controlled, repeatable workflow.
Explore service →Your evaluations contain useful patterns, but scattered scorecards make it hard to see which behaviors need coaching. We turn existing QA results into reporting that teams can inspect and discuss.
Explore service →Bring a current report or workflow example. We will review sources, decisions, and exceptions before proposing a useful scope.